Kent Tugo
07-16-2008, 08:25 AM
Here is one for the technical crowd:
In hopes of not needing to buy cameras to satisfy Section 9, we are employing MAC address filtering at our switches for each device. Of course, if someone can connect an in-line sniffer between POS, etc and the switch - this would defeat this countermeasure. The catch is this sniffer (more like a skimmer) would only work if it did not have a MAC address. Is this possible? I thought any sniffer would need an Ethernet address. I could see this device simply capturing the packets and storing locally - and no way to detect.
Is this possible theoretically and has anyone seen this kind of exploit?
In hopes of not needing to buy cameras to satisfy Section 9, we are employing MAC address filtering at our switches for each device. Of course, if someone can connect an in-line sniffer between POS, etc and the switch - this would defeat this countermeasure. The catch is this sniffer (more like a skimmer) would only work if it did not have a MAC address. Is this possible? I thought any sniffer would need an Ethernet address. I could see this device simply capturing the packets and storing locally - and no way to detect.
Is this possible theoretically and has anyone seen this kind of exploit?